A Century of Research in Natural Resources |
Recreation
Concepts to Manage Resources
for a Spectrum of Experiences |
Following World War II, improved roads, reliable cars, and a growing economy
made the great outdoors more accessible to more people. The paradox: as people
surged to our forests and wildlands, these areas became less wild and the visitors’ experience
changed. Researchers developed the framework that helps balance resources and
facilitate recreation. The science of outdoor recreation analysis is relatively
new, but can trace much of its beginnings to the University of Minnesota and
the USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station in St. Paul. The first
studies—in the 1960s—were of users of the Boundary Waters Canoe
Area Wilderness, Itasca State Park, the Mississippi River, and Isle Royale
National Park.
Forest Service, National Park Service, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
and university researchers work cooperatively to develop strategies to manage
natural areas to sustain both the resource and the human experience. Scientists
developed the concept of “social carrying capacity” to help managers
think in terms of how many people a given area can handle for a specific activity
before either the experience or resource is degraded. |
|
The only remaining social sciences research program
of the National Park Service is at the U of M and involves studies of the
nation’s most-visited national parks, including Grand Canyon, Yosemite,
and Yellowstone. And, the College of Natural Resources is host to a new collaboration
to study how human actions, including recreation, affect Great Lakes area
ecosystems. Researchers are also expanding their focus from public lands
to include resource-based tourism and the impact of private business on the
natural resources that attract visitors. |
Whatever one’s passion or pastime—hunting or fishing, cross-country
skiing or hiking, snowmobiling, or ATV use—it impacts soils, vegetation,
wildlife, water quality, and people. The science of recreation resource management
combines sociology, psychology, economics, wildlife, forestry, fisheries,
conservation, and public policy. With increased demand for recreation, research
helps park, land, and water managers measure needs and resources and guides
them in complex decision making. |
Twenty years of river recreation studies helped shape federal
and state Wild and Scenic River legislation that now guides development
of public lands along the St. Croix, Kettle, and Mississippi rivers and
waterways across the U.S. University researchers developed the Water Resource
Management plan for the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway and lead efforts
to manage multiuse trails in the Snake River watershed. |

|
 |
Access to Minnesota’s northern wilderness areas, particularly in the
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Voyageurs National Park, is a recurring
debate and has generated many studies to craft balanced policies for use. The
first published University studies surveyed visitors in Minnesota’s “canoe
country” in the late ’50s and documented emerging issues: campers
were looking for amenities such as more picnic tables and better toilets, while
the more self-reliant canoeists basically wanted the wilderness left alone.
A five-year U of M Agricultural Experiment Station study in the early years
of the BWCAW found that designated campsites are greatly affected by soil compaction
and loss of vegetation in the first two years of use but show little degradation
after, and led to the designation of fixed campsites. This 1970s era campsite,
with a motorboat visible and audible to the campers, is now in a canoe-only
area. |


|
People choose a specific setting for their recreational activities and have
underlying values and expectations. For example, hiking on a rough trail in
a remote setting offers some visitors a sense of solitude, challenge, and self-reliance.
In contrast, a short, hard-surfaced, interpretive trail with facilities offers
others more comfort, security, and social opportunities.
|
|
U.S. researchers developed a framework—classifying land use from primitive
to roaded-natural to rural to urban—that helps inventory, plan, and
manage recreational experiences and settings. Managers use that framework
to provide a spectrum of choices for people, so the benefits they seek (from
solitude to family time to making new friends) are realized. |
 |
The concept of riparian area development “profiles,” linking biophysical
and social characteristics important to shoreland development, came from a
collaboration of the USDA Forest Service and U of M researchers. Profiles can
be used to identify potential development hot spots so policy makers, planners,
and managers can take timely steps to manage or control the impacts of development.
This is an acute need as Minnesota’s lake country is in demand by younger
retirees with increased recreational time and more money to spend on recreational
activities. |
Park and wilderness use increased dramatically in the 1970s, and Minnesota’s
BWCAW became the most heavily used wilderness in the nation. It was precisely
that popularity that led the USDA Forest Service to regulate use, with entry
permits required since 1966, and limited access beginning in 1976.
Visitors to national parks and wilderness areas are now made aware of ways
to minimize their impact; research has documented that unrestricted use can
damage and even destroy the natural environment people seek. |
 |
|
Index Century of Science Environment Management Recreation Stewardship Measurement
Innovations Alternatives Genetics Urban International 100 Year Reading List